What Happens When a Judge Actually Enforces the 30-Day Pretrial Motion Deadline

Every defense lawyer in Pennsylvania knows the rule. Every defense lawyer in Pennsylvania also knows that in a lot of counties, the rule is not really the rule. Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal…


Eight Issues, Zero Wins — and a Vacated Sentence Anyway: Commonwealth v. Smith

Judge Ruggero Aldisert of the Third Circuit wrote something in 1982 that has been quoted in Pennsylvania appellate opinions ever since. Reflecting on his tenure on the federal bench, he observed that…


Five New Precedential Decisions from the Third Circuit: Guns-for-Drugs, Faretta Waivers, Tax Evasion, and Two Sentencing Holdings

The Third Circuit closed out June with a burst of precedential criminal decisions — five opinions each announcing at least one holding that will matter in federal criminal practice going forward.…


A Body in a Freezer, Years of Stolen Checks — and a Statute of Limitations That Still Expired

Cynthia Black's grandmother died sometime around 2004. Black did not tell anyone. Afraid of losing the Social Security checks that arrived every month in a bank account she shared with her…


When the Commonwealth Keeps Your Property Without Ever Forfeiting It: In re Smith and the De Facto Forfeiture Problem

Say the police seize your lawfully owned firearm during an arrest. The charges get dismissed. You file the motion you're supposed to file to get your property back. And the Commonwealth — without…


Three From the Superior Court in One Day: Another Probation Win, a Lesson on Commonwealth Appeals, and a Burglary Question That Wasn't Close

On May 20, 2026, the Superior Court handed down three precedential decisions in criminal cases. They don't share a common theme — one is about probation revocation, one is about when the Commonwealth…


When Is a 36-Second Restraint a Crime? The Superior Court's Divided Answer in Evans

How long does a restraint have to last before it becomes the crime of false imprisonment? Pennsylvania's false imprisonment statute does not say. It speaks instead of conduct that interferes…


When the Commonwealth Wants to Walk Away: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Reaffirms Reinhart in Commonwealth v. Harrison

Most criminal cases end the way you'd expect — with a plea, a verdict, or a dismissal at the preliminary hearing. But sometimes a prosecutor decides, after charges are filed and held for court, that…


What You Say, What You Don't Say, and What the Law Does With Both

Two decisions came down from the Pennsylvania Superior Court on March 27, 2026, and at first glance they don't seem to have much in common. One is a suppression case arising from a traffic stop in…


The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's March 2026 Term: Three Decisions Worth Knowing

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down three significant criminal law decisions on March 26, 2026. The most important — by a wide margin — is Commonwealth v. Derek Lee, a ruling that upends…


James Law Logo

James Law, LLC is a trial and appellate practice with office locations in White Oak and McMurray, Pennsylvania. We handle a wide range of criminal-defense matters in both state and federal court, and represent the interests of attorneys, judges, and law students facing ethical and character-and-fitness inquiries. Visit Ethics Website

© 2016 – 2026 James Law, LLC. Privacy Policy
James Law, LLC is committed to ensuring digital accessibility for people with disabilities and welcomes your feedback. Please let us know if you encounter accessibility barriers, have any questions, or need assistance by contacting us at Ryan@RHJamesLaw.com.